Should President Omar al-Bashir of Sudan Be Charged and Arrested by the International Criminal Court?

نویسندگان

  • Alex de Waal
  • Gregory H. Stanton
  • Samuel Totten
چکیده

The recent activity at the International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague concerning the case of President Omar al-Bashir and the crisis in Darfur has set off a firestorm of commentary amongst international lawyers, human rights activists, genocide scholars, experts on Sudan, and journalists, among others. Some argue that the ICC prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, was correct in charging al-Bashir with genocide and crimes against humanity; others believe that he had little to no grounds for doing so. Furthermore, while some see the prosecutor’s charges of genocide as questionable, at best, and highly counterproductive, if not dangerous, at worst, others see the genocide charge as positive and a move toward ending impunity for genocide. The same is largely true of the arrest warrant that the ICC has issued for President al-Bashir’s arrest. Dr. Alex de Waal, an Oxford-trained social anthropologist, a fellow of the Global Equity Initiative at Harvard University, and the director of Justice Africa in London; and Dr. Gregory H. Stanton, a Yale University-educated lawyer and University of Chicago-trained cultural anthropologist, professor of Genocide Studies and Prevention at George Mason University, president of Genocide Watch, and immediate past president of the International Association of Genocide Scholars, kindly accepted GSP editor Samuel Totten’s invitaThis Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Tampa Library at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation de Waal, Alex and Stanton, Gregory H. (2009) "Should President Omar al-Bashir of Sudan Be Charged and Arrested by the International Criminal Court?," Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 4: Iss. 3: Article 5. Available at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol4/iss3/5 tion to debate the merits and demerits of the prosecutor’s charges and the ICC’s issuance of the warrant.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

International Criminal Court Prosecutor's Initiative to initiate investigations

The main purpose of the establishment of the International Criminal Court is to investigate and prosecute international perpetrators of crimes, so that these individuals are not left without bureaucracy. To accomplish this, the Prosecutor of the Court has a tremendous duty. Selection of the situation and initiation of its research and its initial review is done according to reports, documents, ...

متن کامل

Establishment an international prison in order to Execution of criminal sentences of the International Criminal Court

However, the punishment of imprisonment has become the main response of domestic and international arsenals; But now one of the most important challenges facing the International Criminal Court is how to enforce its sentences, and especially the execution of imprisonment.according to the Statute of the Court, imprisonment is carried out through voluntary agreements with the receiving countries ...

متن کامل

Validation and Validation of Testimony of Anonymous Instances in the Criminal Procedure Code of Iran and Statute of the International Criminal Court

One of the measures taken to protect witnesses in the Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Code of Judicial Procedure of our country is to keep their identities secret. Both the defendant is important and the defendant's right can not be ignored for the sake of witness testimony or the defendant's defense rights were endangered and threatened without regard to witness safety. Reg...

متن کامل

SELECTED ARTICLE ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW: What does .intent to destroy. in genocide mean?

Genocide is a crime with a double mental element, i.e. a general intent as to the underlying acts, and an ulterior intent with regard to the ultimate aim of the destruction of the group. The prevailing view in the case-law interprets the respective ‘intent to destroy’ requirement as a special or specific intent (dolus specialis) stressing its volitional or purpose-based tendency. While this vie...

متن کامل

Victims\' Law Seen from the Perspective of Fair Trial and Ethics in the Criminal Procedure Code of 2013 and the International Criminal Court Statute

Background: With the idea of victim protection emerging and the emergence of supportive victimology in the twentieth century, the forgotten position of the victim in the criminal process has been restored and its findings expressed in the form of universal standards for victim protection. Support for the victim is indispensable and indisputable in criminal proceedings. This support has various ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016